Uniform Function Call Syntax?

[Patience via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 7 March 2016 at 00:19:07 UTC, Xinok wrote:
> On Sunday, 6 March 2016 at 07:45:58 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
> wrote:
>> I think it would be better idea to just add the ability to add 
>> unicode operators, and to avoid precedence issues one could 
>> just require them to use parentheses. That way you could 
>> define opCustom"•" and use it as:
>>
>> ( point1 • point2 )
>
> Please no. If I need to open up Character Map just to write 
> code, something has gone horribly wrong.

A proper code editor could handle this. Type something like ctrl 
+ ? and it pops up all the implemented uni-code operators.

Else we are stuck in the past until you decide to change...