[r/cpp] Why I am not happy with C++17

Minas Mina via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Mar 8 22:08:57 PST 2016


On Tuesday, 8 March 2016 at 22:53:01 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 8 March 2016 at 18:24:54 UTC, Minas Mina wrote:
>> I honestly don't care about those. Boost has them. Modules are 
>> far more important for me.
>
> Just found out that Modules weren't supposed to be scheduled 
> for C++17 anyway, but was already meant to be a separate TS. 
> Seems like the C++ standard process will be more continuous 
> than before.

Is the modules specification finalized though? As far as I know 
there were two implementations, clang's and vc++'s.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list