Suggested Change to Contract Syntax

[jmh530 via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 11 March 2016 at 00:07:45 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
> You're not using in or out contracts here at all, so so of 
> course, you're not going to see how in/out contracts work with 
> inheritance in this example. To quote 
> http://dlang.org/spec/contracts.html:
>

Sigh...my point was that I was replacing the in/out contracts 
with what you were saying about asserts and scope(exit). Not that 
I have no idea what in/out contracts are.

I will review what you wrote.