the most D-ish GUI library

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 14/03/16 10:20, Saša Janiška wrote:
> Jaocb Carlborg <doob at me.com> writes:
>
>> There's DWT [1] as well.
>
> Wrong URL. ;)

How embarrassing :). Here is the correct URL [1] for reference.

> I must admit I'm totally ignorant about Java and I neither use like the
> language nor do I use any Java app. :-)

"interface" would in this case refer to the API of the code and not the 
GUI of an application.


> If you say that "anything that is non-native or doesn't look native is
> not acceptable on OS X" what is the advantage of DWT in comparison with
> GtkD for Mac OS?

Well, currently there is no support for OS X so if that's a requirement 
then DWT will obviously not work. Personally I would not create an 
application for OS X at all if it did not have a native GUI.

A couple of years ago I started on an OS X port [2], but I've abandoned 
that in favor of automating the porting process [3]. The automated 
process is intended to work for all platforms.

If the OS X port was complete, the advantage over GtkD would be that it 
would be native.

[1] https://github.com/d-widget-toolkit/dwt
[2] https://github.com/d-widget-toolkit/dwt-mac
[3] https://github.com/d-widget-toolkit/jport/tree/dev

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg