the most D-ish GUI library

[Luis via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 15 March 2016 at 08:37:13 UTC, Jaocb Carlborg wrote:
> On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 20:26:51 UTC, Saša Janiška wrote:
>
>> Well, OS X and Windows are 'nice to have'.
>
> DWT already works on Windows where it uses native drawing 
> operations.
>
>> So, DWT works on Mac OS, but it's not native as GtkD and you 
>> do not have intention to work on OS X port, right?
>
> No, DWT does _not_ work on OS X, neither native nor non-native. 
> I'm working on the OS X port indirectly. The automated process 
> should work for all ports.
>
> Another advantage for DWT would be that since it's native, it 
> has no dependencies except for what's already provided by the 
> system.
>
> --
> /Jacob Carlborg

Suddenly I have interest on DWT. I thought that was a simple copy 
of SWT, not being native...