Up-to-date DIPs list

[ZombineDev via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 12 March 2016 at 12:49:42 UTC, Seb wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> tl;dr: D's DIPs seem not maintained. A couple of ideas are 
> proposed to tackle this state.
>
> [...]

+1

The formal process required for library additions to 
std.experimental was a step in the right direction, IMO.

Rust also has well written document on this topic:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/README.md

I think you should structure your proposal as a DIP. For example:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP75
http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/Process

You also probably link it from the overview page 
(http://wiki.dlang.org/DIPs).

BTW all documents describing formal processes (review, release), 
design rational, etc. should be better organized.