Idea: std.build instead of dub and make-like tools

[Piotrek via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 14:20:23 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 09:54:53 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
>> On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 09:51:03 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
>>> 2. Not "slim" syntax
>>> I have similar view on the syntax as Dicebot: 
>>> http://forum.dlang.org/post/vqdhbplqezgdmgumfxte@forum.dlang.org
>>
>> But have to add that I want event simpler (no templates etc.)
>
> The reason why there are templates is so that the declarations 
> can be in global scope, like a scripting language.
>
>> declarations and primitives like e.g. in SCons.
>
> You mean like `Program` and `Object`? The equivalent are 
> `scriptlike` and `objectFiles`. There are several high-level 
> rules as well.
>
> Atila

I was thinking about simple declarative syntax plus fallback to
imperative style for custom needs.

I will try to give a feedback on reggae after I go further with 
experimenting.

Piotrek