Policy for exposing range structs

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d]

On 3/25/16 3:04 PM, Anon wrote:
>
> These repetitions could be eliminated relatively easily (from a user's
> perspective, anyway; things might be more difficult in the actual
> implementation).
>
> Two changes to the mangling:

[snip]

Please add these ideas to the bug report! I'm not sure if it completely 
fixes this or not, but it's worth exploring options.

This is similar to how I was thinking we should approach this.

-Steve