Policy for exposing range structs

Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Mar 26 09:37:41 PDT 2016


On 3/26/16 1:24 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 03/25/2016 10:30 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>> On Friday, 25 March 2016 at 14:07:41 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>> We should actually be moving *away from* voldemort types:
>>
>> Indeed, they basically suck.
>
> I love those things! -- Andrei
>

I prefer voldemort types too! To repeat all the template machinery in an 
external struct is annoying. So nice to just put "struct X" inside the 
function.

But clearly, not worth the pain if this can't be fixed.

-Steve


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list