Policy for exposing range structs
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Mar 26 09:37:41 PDT 2016
On 3/26/16 1:24 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 03/25/2016 10:30 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>> On Friday, 25 March 2016 at 14:07:41 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>> We should actually be moving *away from* voldemort types:
>>
>> Indeed, they basically suck.
>
> I love those things! -- Andrei
>
I prefer voldemort types too! To repeat all the template machinery in an
external struct is annoying. So nice to just put "struct X" inside the
function.
But clearly, not worth the pain if this can't be fixed.
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list