Females in the community.

[QAston via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 18:31:06 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> It actually does. The key points for the election campaign is 
> the same at the early campaign Hitler had. Restore the pride of 
> Germany. Restore German industry. Blame an outgroup. There is 
> also pretty good overlap in his 1933 speech. Politically, who 
> knows. Trumps political position is: elect me and I will figure 
> it out later. And that actually is the core of fascism, handing 
> power to the strong leader.
>
> Trump is a caricature of a wannabe fascist, the spineless 
> variant that fucks up the world by accident. Which is not 
> entirely unthinkable as his resorts and Trump Tower will be 
> jihadist targets. Only God knows what will follow. Hopefully 
> not missile launches.
>
> In direct comparison he is much more in the line of Mussolini, 
> Berlusconi, Milosevic and their like. We certainly have 
> comparison material here in Europe.

I didn't want to end my participation in this discussion on a 
negative note, but this reply is so ironic it hurts.

A person who advocates for a more welcoming community and wishes 
for objective moderation introduces a divisive topic (US 
election) and goes on about it; despite having been personally 
asked by a moderator to not do that [1].

There's a reason why Godwin's law exists - it points out that 
comparisons to unrelated, emotionally loaded topics are not 
arguments - just diversion. Fascism and Hitler are just the most 
popular ones to use. Nobody cares about actual meaning of nazism 
and fascism - it's just an emotional blindfold, frequently used 
by media to slander and for clickbait. Why don't we leave US 
election discussion to US citizens on forums devoted to politics.

https://forum.dlang.org/post/nd35j5$14k2$1@digitalmars.com