Categorization of warnings
Johan Engelen via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Mar 29 06:04:26 PDT 2016
On Tuesday, 29 March 2016 at 04:29:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On 03/28/2016 08:05 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> Warnings can be an important part of the deprecation process.
>> The next release of the compiler will illustrate that.
>
> No. Deciding that warnings have any relation with deprecation
> process was huge mistake and, as far as I know, it is going to
> be fixed. Though it can easily be that something new and
> annoying has slipped into next release too.
I was very surprised I had to catagorize some warnings as
"soon-deprecated". Let's get the remaining two "warnings" to
deprecated status asap then?
https://dlang.org/deprecate.html
(they are warnings from 2.067)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list