Could we reserve void[T] for builtin set of T ?

[BLM768 via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 31 March 2016 at 20:51:53 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
>
> Wouldn't just be better to use a std.allocator backed set 
> container instead over special casing the AA syntax like this?

Syntactically, that makes more sense.

Or there's always ubyte[0][T].