Need a Faster Compressor
Era Scarecrow via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat May 21 14:27:37 PDT 2016
On Saturday, 21 May 2016 at 21:12:15 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> So really, how good are you at fast code?
I recall being able to get a marginal boost in speed by assigning
the first 1-2 bytes in preassigned buckets (256 & 65536
respectively), so you have an immediate 1-2 byte matches
(skipping the chafe so to speak). Unfortunately memory-wise it's
highly inefficient and requires 2 passes over the data, and
probably doesn't play well with cache.
I assume this is related to compressing symbols thread? I
mentioned possibly considering the LZO library.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list