aliasing expressions and identifiers
Nick Treleaven via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon May 23 08:18:51 PDT 2016
On Monday, 23 May 2016 at 14:05:43 UTC, deed wrote:
> Some thoughts about extending the with-statement were brought
> up here earlier:
> http://forum.dlang.org/post/txpifmwpmmhsvcpbcijw@forum.dlang.org
> I don't care much whether it would be with, alias or possibly
> something clever already existing, but a solution should be
> easy to use, easy to read and shouldn't introduce any possible
> overhead at runtime.
From the linked thread:
> ref M() { return matrix.rawArr; }
> ref Ex1() { return e1.someProperties.someModulusX; }
If we had local refs, we could use this instead:
ref m = matrix.rawArr;
The difference is m is already computed, it is not recomputed
each time m is read, unlike M(). I think the reason D doesn't
support local refs is because it would make it harder to design
@safe, particularly with the planned @rc ref-counting. Because
M() above is only a return reference, it can't live longer than
the data it references. My ref m could persist longer than
matrix.rawArr using (naive) reference counting.
BTW local refs are possible in @system code:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/lmuokynffgljzvrpvkvd@forum.dlang.org
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list