The Case Against Autodecode

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 5/27/16 12:40 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Exactly. And we just keep getting stuck on this point. It seems that the
> message just isn't getting through. The unfounded assumption continues
> to be made that iterating by code point is somehow "correct" by
> definition and nobody can challenge it.

Which languages are covered by code points, and which languages require 
graphemes consisting of multiple code points? How does normalization 
play into this? -- Andrei