Our Sister
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri May 27 14:25:50 PDT 2016
On 05/27/2016 05:02 PM, Era Scarecrow wrote:
> With the current state of things, I'll just take your word on it.
Reasoning is simple - yes we could safely convert to const(char)[] but
that means effectively all refcounting is lost for that string. So we
can convert but in an explicit manner, e.g.
str.toGCThisWillCompletelySuckMan. -- Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list