faster splitter

[Jon Degenhardt via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 29 May 2016 at 21:07:21 UTC, qznc wrote:
> On Sunday, 29 May 2016 at 18:50:40 UTC, Jon Degenhardt wrote:
>> A minor thing - you might consider also calculating the median 
>> and median version of MAD (median of absolute deviations from 
>> the median). The reason is that benchmarks often have outliers 
>> in the max time dimension, median will do a job reducing the 
>> effect of those outliers than mean. Your benchmark code could 
>> publish both forms.
>
> I don't think that would help. This is not a normal 
> distribution, so mean and median don't match anyways. What 
> would you learn from the median?
>

Oh, I see. The benchmark varies the data on each run and 
aggregates, is that right? Sorry, I missed that.