The Case Against Autodecode
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon May 30 08:58:18 PDT 2016
On 05/29/2016 04:47 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> It depends on what you're trying to accomplish. That's the point we're
> trying to get at. For some operations, working with code points makes
> the most sense. But for other operations, it does not. There is no one
> representation that is best for all situations; it needs to be decided
> on a case-by-case basis. Which is why forcing everything to decode to
> code points eventually leads to problems.
I see. Again this all to me sounds like "naked arrays of characters are
the wrong choice and should have been encapsulated in a dedicated string
type". -- Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list