Intresa in Static Analysis for D ?

[Basile B. via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:38:39 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:28:30 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 14:45:29 UTC, Stefan Koch 
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Guys,
>>>
>>> I was wondering how much interest in static analysis exists 
>>> in this community .
>>> DMD already has rudimentary support for these kinds of things.
>>
>> cyclic complexity
>> NPath complexity
>> Halstead complexity
>>
>> 3 nice fields of static analysis.
>>
>> I'm currently working on Halstead 
>> (https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/blob/master/dastworx/src/halstead.d)
>>
>> The Halstead metric (1977) is often considered as ratio of the 
>> number of line code, while it's actually not at all. The 
>> Halstead is based on the operations and the operations 
>> arguments. You can have small functions using a lot of 
>> operands that will be bug prone. You can have huge functions 
>> with very few operands used and that are not bug prone. The 
>> Halstead metric can detect them. It can tell you: "take care 
>> of this function".
>>
>> ;]
>
> I think you mixed up Pow and Xor.
>
> You will probably want to change from a AA to a normal array 
> and just assign a numeric index to each expression you care 
> about :)

pffff you dont get the point.
The point is when an IDE message leads you to this:
http://imgur.com/a/6zLHU