A simple solution for randomness copy problem

[Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 30 November 2016 at 11:29:25 UTC, Joseph Rushton 
Wakeling wrote:
> On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 at 08:50:52 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
>>         if (isSaturatedRandomEngine!G)
>
> Question on your terminology here: while saturated makes sense, 
> is it really your intention to restrict things to random 
> _engines_ (i.e. pseudo-random algorithms)?  Surely it should 
> also be possible for this functionality to work with random 
> devices?

Of course they can work with random devices. It looks strange to 
me to have explicit  API difference between engines and devices. 
A random devices can be marked as random engines or we can add a 
simple generic adaptor (Device->Engine) for them. --Ilya

I will be happy to se your PR for random devices to mir-random.

Thanks,
Ilya