Unum II announcement

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 25 September 2016 at 11:00:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 9/24/16 10:22 PM, Nick B wrote:
>> I suggest that now, programmers would/may have a choice: be 
>> slow and
>> correct, or fast and incorrect, and that would depend if real 
>> accuracy
>> is important or not, the types of problems being work on, and 
>> cost of
>> failure.
>
> Let me just say it doesn't seem our policy of "slow but 
> correct" has bore fruit, and I think it's time to dispense with 
> it. There are methods to improve correctness through 
> algorithmic means, but slow primitives you're stuck with. -- 
> Andrei

<3