color lib

[Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 8 October 2016 at 13:06:42 UTC, Manu wrote:
> On 7 October 2016 at 18:09, Ethan Watson via Digitalmars-d 
> <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>> On Friday, 7 October 2016 at 01:57:06 UTC, Manu wrote:
>>>
>>> Regarding 'Linear.No'... yeah... I dunno. I've had this 
>>> argument before. I really hate that pattern. If it's 
>>> required, I'll do it
>>
>>
>> At least as far as readability goes, explicit parameterisation 
>> lets you understand the invocation at a glance rather than 
>> already knowing the actual name of the parameter or having to 
>> go elsewhere in code to see the prototype. For a library, I'd 
>> favor readability.
>
> Oh no, you too? >_<
> Incidentally, have you had a geez over the core API? An 
> efficient API
> will emerge when we work out how to work batched operations into
> ranges...

I like true/false here :-)