Reducing the cost of autodecoding

safety0ff via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Oct 13 14:49:22 PDT 2016


On Thursday, 13 October 2016 at 01:36:44 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
>
> Oh ok, so it's that checksum in particular that got optimized. 
> Bad benchmark! Bad! -- Andrei

Also, I suspect a benchmark with a larger loop body might not 
benefit as significantly from branch hints as this one.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list