Fallback 'catch-all' template functions

[Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 1 September 2016 at 10:43:50 UTC, Dominikus Dittes 
Scherkl wrote:
> I have never seen what benefit could be gained from having 
> overloads. I think they are a relict from languages without 
> static if.

I mean, overloads with same function signature except for the 
condition. Of course if the overloads have different parameters 
or return type, they may make sense. But they still uglyfy the 
API, so I try to avoid them - instead I use default parameters 
and template parameters what pretty much always works.