Struct default constructor - need some kind of solution for C++ interop

[Lodovico Giaretta via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 at 13:44:37 UTC, Ethan Watson wrote:
> [...]
> Suggestions?

Of course I don't know which level of usability you want to 
achieve, but I think that in this case your bind system, when 
binding a default ctor, could use @disable this() and define a 
factory method (do static opCall work?) that calls the C++ ctor.

It's not as good-looking as a true default ctor, but it doesn't 
provide any way to introduce bugs and it's not that bad (just a 
couple key strokes).