Null references and access violation
Bauss via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Sep 14 09:52:19 PDT 2016
Can someone riddle me this, why D gives an access violation
instead of ex. a null reference exception?
Like let's say you have a field that's a class and you forget to
give it a value. Now that will cause an access violation, but
generally access violations are an indication that you're program
has reached a nasty state and can't be recovered. Hence why you
cannot catch it by doing a normal catch block for "Exception",
but has to do on "Throwable" (Idk if "Error" works for?) Now
that's a problem, because in that particular case the program may
still work without being in an unrecoverable state.
Of course it can be resolved by catching it, but what about
actual unrecoverable access violations? You will be shadowing
those too then.
This is especially a problem when you work with 3rd party
libraries where you basically have no control over what happens.
Is there a way around this, to make thins like not assigning an
instance to a class cause some null reference exception or is
there a specific reason why it exactly throws an access violation
error.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list