ddoc latex/formulas?

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 09/15/2016 10:15 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 September 2016 at 13:12:05 UTC, Manu wrote:
>> What does that mean? What's your process to produce this output?
>
> ./adrdox test.d
>
> The program internally runs pipeProcess over to latex to make the image
> when it sees the $(MATH ....) syntax.
>
>> Problem is, phobos uses vanilla ddoc... so we need that to do
>> everything we need.
>
> Yeah, that's why I forked phobos for my doc project too. Vanilla ddoc is
> a dead end.

Wait, but I just showed how with vanilla ddoc you can immediately use 
mathjax to do better than adrdox. No need for any pre/postprocessing or 
scripting, just one line of import. Could you please respond to that? -- 
Andrei