The worst Phobos template (in binderoo)

[Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 15 September 2016 at 23:25:34 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 September 2016 at 23:08:54 UTC, Andrei 
> Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>> Yes, that DIP.[http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP57] It would need some 
>> more formal work before defining an implementation. Stefan, 
>> would you want to lead that effort? -- Andrei
>
> I am not good at defining semantics, yet I would participate in 
> a joint effort with Timon.

I thought some more about this. static foreach is probably not a 
good idea at this point.

We should focus on getting the existing features to do their job 
properly and we won't have to add yet more meanings to the word 
static.

Our code-generation facilities with CTFE and mixins are very good 
indeed.
When polished CTFE can totally be used as a serious workhorse for 
cases that would have fallen intro the static foreach category.