Mir GLAS vs Intel MKL: which is faster?
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Sep 24 12:01:47 PDT 2016
On 09/24/2016 01:46 PM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
> Eigen was added (but only data, still need to write text). Relative
> charts was added.
Looks awesome. Couple more nits after one more pass:
"numerical and scientific projects" -> "numeric and scientific projects"
"OpenBLAS Haswell computation kernels" -> "The OpenBLAS Haswell
computation kernels"
"To add a new architecture or target an engineer" -> "To add a new
architecture or target, an engineer"
"configurations are available for X87, SSE2, AVX, and AVX2 instruction
sets" -> "configurations are available for the X87, SSE2, AVX, and AVX2
instruction sets"
In the machine, you may want to specify the amount of L2 cache (I think
it's 6 MB)
Instead of "Recent" MKL, a version number would be more precise
Relative performance plots should specify "percent", i.e. "Performance
relative to Mir" -> "Performance relative to Mir [%]"
"General Matrix-matrix Multiplication" -> "General Matrix-Matrix
Multiplication"
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list