Overloading relational operators separately; thoughts?

[Minty Fresh via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 20:16:08 UTC, Walter Bright 
wrote:
> To reiterate, operator overloading exists in D to support the 
> inclusion of arithmetic library types. Any other purpose is 
> discouraged, and that includes expression templates and things 
> like << for iostreams.

It seeds rather harsh to discourage every possible use case of a 
feature sans one, simply because one does not agree with the 
others.