Overloading relational operators separately; thoughts?

[pineapple via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 30 September 2016 at 00:50:54 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> Except that it kind of is. It's an example of a language 
> allowing you to mess with too much and make it so that it 
> doesn't function as expected, which is what happens when you 
> overload operators to act in a way inconsistent with how they 
> work with the built-in types.

Which language is more widely used? D or Perl?

Let me see if I understand your argument: We can't make D more 
expressive because a language far more popular than D is so 
expressive it makes it possible to do unconventional things, if 
you are so inclined?