Exceptions in @nogc code

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 4/6/2017 6:32 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> It was specified to a fairly good extent in the lifetime ML (especialy the scope
> part, was specified in extreme details) and got ignored.

When referencing previous discussions, please include a link. Having people 
guess at where such discussion took place (github? wiki? bugzilla? n.g.? IRC? 
DConf?), and which thread it might be, is not helpful. The last time upthread I 
tried to find one such you referred to I came up empty-handed.