multiple `alias this` suggestion
Carl Sturtivant via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Apr 24 09:52:49 PDT 2017
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 14:55:31 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
> I agree, I like how this solves the ambiguity problem nicely.
> However, this disallows using introspection to declare multiple
> alias this piecemeal. e.g.:
>
> struct S(bool foo)
> {
> int x;
> alias x this;
> static if(foo)
> {
> string y;
> alias y this;
> }
> }
>
> One thing we can do also is just use declaration order to
> prioritize which alias this to use.
Not necessary in this case:
struct S(bool foo)
{
int x;
static if(!foo)
{
alias x this;
}
else
{
string y;
alias x, y this;
}
}
It's easier to analyze if isn't distributed, i.e. if only one
location applies.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list