Passing variables, preserving UDAs: A Gripe

[Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d]

On 02/08/2017 01:00 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
> But even if that did compile, it still wouldn't work because doStuff
> wouldn't be able to access "foo.s" since "foo" isn't getting passed in
> in any way.
>

I mean, in order to *set* a value for "foo.s", not *just* access UDAs.