If you needed any more evidence that memory safety is the future...

[Chris Wright via Digitalmars-d]

On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 13:23:03 +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
> If 'disable' (as can be reasonably expected) means the compiler will
> behave as if they were never present, then it does not.

https://dlang.org/dmd-linux.html#switch-release

Plus I actually tested it.

> Ketmar described the removal of safety measures. With -release,
> assertions pose an additional safety risk.

Assertions not executing is not undefined behavior.