GNU License warning:

[Chris M. via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 21:53:29 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
> On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 19:30:40 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:19:57 +0000, Ignacious wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> LGPL is much more common, and LGPL isn't a problem when you 
>> distribute by source. It *is* a problem with static linking 
>> with binary distributions (which is the default for D).
>>
>> This is not a new issue. Software licensing is a well 
>> understood, well publicized concern. It doesn't merit alarmism.
>
> Sure it does! Stop being a Nazi war criminal wanna be! Do you 
> work for the FOSSF? Otherwise known as the F-OSS-F = Future - 
> Office of Strategic Services - Foundation.

What is this thread accomplishing other than ranting about GPL 
and calling others Nazis?