Voting for std.experimental.checkedint

[Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 16 January 2017 at 19:51:38 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> On Saturday, January 14, 2017 20:54:11 Jack Stouffer via 
> Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 12:39:38 UTC, Robert burner 
>> Schadek
>>
>> wrote:
>> > ...
>>
>> Overall, the code looks good and the design looks solid. 
>> However, I have no personal use for such a module, so I can't 
>> really comment on it's design with any authority.
>>
>> Abstain.
>
> That's pretty much the boat I'm in, though I've never looked at 
> it in depth. It's one of those things that a few folks seem to 
> think is vital, but I have zero use for it. It's trying to 
> solve a problem that I simply don't have.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

Same here.

Atila