On Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 09:06:18 UTC, Guillaume Chatelet
wrote:
>> ubyte[256] data;
>> foreach(ubyte i; 0..256) {
>> ubyte x = data[i];
>> }
>>
>
> Yes. Much better. What's the rewrite in this case? Using a
> size_t internally and casting to ubyte?
I was just wondering