pragma(mangle) on types
Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jul 11 07:14:56 PDT 2017
On 2017-07-11 15:25, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
> Thinking about this a bit more it might make sense to introduce another
> pragma, e.g.
> `pragma(name, "...")`, which would essentially mean "the identifier used
> in the declaration this pragma applies to is chosen for identifier
> restrictions in D; use the identifier specified by the pragma as the
> starting point for mangling instead",
Yeah, that makes sense. I didn't really think about that the C++ mangler
might use something slightly different than the exact symbol name.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list