Slides share: DMesos - Not only a re-implementation of Mesos

Patrick Schluter via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Jul 12 22:48:18 PDT 2017


On Monday, 10 July 2017 at 18:45:34 UTC, Nick Sabalausky 
(Abscissa) wrote:
> On 07/10/2017 02:16 PM, Joakim wrote:
>> I'm actually skeptical of cloud- I think mobile p2p will eat 
>> most of the cloud-
>
> I've been REALLY hoping p2p will 
> eat...cloud^H^H^H^H^Hcentralized internet services[1], but if I 
> were a betting man I'd bet heavily against it. For one thing, 
> for p2p to kill "cloud" we'd realistically need IPv6 to become 
> much more ubiquitous, and that just isn't happening.
>
> And I think the #2 reason IPv6 isn't happening (behind plain 
> old inertia) is that it would *allow* p2p to overtake cloud. 
> Which brings me to the next reason I don't think p2p will kill 
> "cloud": All the big players with all the money and the power 
> all LOVE "cloud" because it allows them to hoard more power, 
> control and money, whereas p2p would completely destroy that 
> frontier for them.
>
> Also, replacing "cloud" with p2p would mean more reliance on 
> user's devices actually having decent storage and upload 
> bandwidth, but non-power-users (ie the vast majority of people, 
> if you don't live in hipster valley) are ambivalent towards 
> that, and it would raise the price of their devices, AND they 
> don't want to deal with running low on storage, or backing 
> things up, so they love "cloud" too.
>
> Both the engineer and the humanitarian in me both REALLY want 
> to see p2p eat "cloud", but I just don't see it realistically 
> happening.
>
> [1] The word "clould" bugs me to no end. It's the tech sector's 
> equivalent to "smurf" - stupid word is used to mean *anything* 
> internet-releated, even "internet" itself.

May be this companay can make it happen
http://www.piedpiper.com/
;-)


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list