An Issue I Wish To Raise Awareness On
Dukc via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Jul 19 09:45:28 PDT 2017
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 15:38:08 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> Unless you're saying that the above should work even though it
> currently doesn't. Even then, I don't know about that. If your
> type is complex enough to need a shared dtor then the dtor
> probably needs to do some locking or extra checks. You don't
> want to impose that cost on a struct instance which isn't
> shared.
Yes, just what I meant. And perfectly explained why we need
something better.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list