DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 2 Begins

[Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 25 July 2017 at 07:58:13 UTC, Olivier FAURE wrote:
>
> I feel like making a list of alternative proposals and why they 
> were rejected would still be a good idea, both to improve the 
> quality of the debate in this thread (people are proposing 
> alternative syntaxes that should be addressed in the DIP), and 
> for posterity.

We weren't speaking of rejected proposals, but of previously 
reviewed drafts. Rejected proposals already include a summary of 
why they were rejected. You can a list of all DIPs submitted 
under the current process, including links and their current 
status, at:

https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/README.md

And please everyone, I'm happy to discuss ideas to improve the 
DIP process, but let's not do it in the review threads. Email me, 
start a new thread, whatever, but please try to keep review 
threads on the topic at hand. Thanks!