[OT] Re: strong typing for browser code [Was: D easily overlooked?]
Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jul 25 06:36:34 PDT 2017
On Tuesday, 25 July 2017 at 10:27:43 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
> There is little traction in a browser-focused language that
> doesn't offer a massive USP over JavaScript/ECMAScript – typing
> is the only USP over ES6 that has any chance really. Elm,
> Kotlin, Ceylon, etc. are already populating the market. I
> suspect Dart will have little hope for traction now.
Well, most languages have little hope for traction :-). Traction
comes predominantly from specific use cases, so it all depends on
whether Google is going to push Dart as a cross platform
programming language with flutter.io and how it is used
internally at Google. I think they use it for their Google Ads
software, so I guess it currently is quite important for them.
Anyhow, my point was more that Google's actual usage and needs
might affect where Go 2 heads if we judge by Dart has evolved
over time. I assume that the initial design of Go and Dart was
more based on designe aesthetics, and that actual demand will
drive the evolution if they are used extensively internally at
Google...
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list