Concept proposal: Safely catching error
Moritz Maxeiner via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Jun 5 03:59:28 PDT 2017
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 09:50:15 UTC, Olivier FAURE wrote:
> My proposal for solving these problems would be to explicitly
> allow to catch Errors in @safe code IF the try block from which
> the Error is caught is perfectly pure.
>
> This would allow to design applications that can fail
> gracefully when dealing with multiple independent clients or
> tasks, even when one of the tasks has to thrown away because of
> a programmer error.
>
> What do you think? Does the idea have merit? Should I make it
> into a DIP?
Pragmatic question: How much work do you think this will require?
Because writing a generic wrapper that you can customize the
fault behaviour for using DbI requires very little[1].
[1]
https://github.com/Calrama/libds/blob/fbceda333dbf76697050faeb6e25dbfcc9e3fbc0/src/ds/linear/array/dynamic.d
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list