Isn't it about time for D3?

[meppl via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 10 June 2017 at 23:30:18 UTC, Liam McGillivray wrote:
> I realize that there are people who want to continue using D as 
> it is, but those people may continue to use D2. Putting the 
> breaking changes in a separate branch ensures that DM won't 
> lose current clients as they can just continue using D2 as they 
> are. Even after D3 is stabilized, D2 could have continued 
> support until nobody wants it.
>

sorry, i was overreading those lines of yours