Isn't it about time for D3?
Patrick Schluter via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jun 13 10:57:14 PDT 2017
Before even contemplating a big disrupting language split like
proposed by the OP, wouldn't it first more appropriate to write a
nice article, DIP, blog, whatever, listing the defects of the
current language that can not be solved by progressive evolution?
I haven't the impression that the *language* itself suffer from
so big flaws that it would warrant to fork it in a way that will
lead to a lot frustration and bewilderment.
D is not perfect, no question, but it is not in a state that
would jusrify such a harsh approach.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list