atomic operations compared to c++
rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Jun 14 05:27:44 PDT 2017
On 14/06/2017 1:15 PM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
snip
>>> I don't know if D compiler is aware of the fences and won't move
>>> out/in
>>> instructions from guarded areas.
>>>
>>> Thanks: gzp
>>
>> Please create an issue here: issues.dlang.org for druntime atomic
>> support.
>> Clearly the requirements that we have been working under are not up
>> to
>> your expectations (or needs).
>
> Is an issue the right vehicle for investigating the need for these?
Yes. A N.G. post will be forgotten about quickly, but an issue in the
bug tracker can send you updates as things progress.
At the end of the day, that module grew organically, it just needs a bit
of planning put into it for the future that's all.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list