CTFE Status 2
David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jun 20 12:37:47 PDT 2017
On Tuesday, 20 June 2017 at 19:01:06 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 June 2017 at 18:58:36 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 20 June 2017 at 17:35:28 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>>> Hit me with brittle numeric code please!
>>> […]
>>>
>>> Unfortunately this also broke the phobos unitttests since now
>>> more of is attempted to be evaluated.
>>
>> Just making sure that the Phobos unit tests pass at compile
>> time (with 64 bit reals, if that is what you support) should
>> be a good start.
>>
>> — David
>
> Fixed.
But how much of the std.math code are you actually executing with
newCTFE? What I meant is that if the std.math{,special}
implementations of the various mathematical functions work, there
shouldn't be any egregious issues. I'm not sure how much of it is
usually run during CTFE, though.
— David
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list