If you needed any more evidence that memory safety is the future...

[Kagamin via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 24 February 2017 at 19:19:57 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner 
wrote:
> *Then* you have to provide conclusive (or at the very least 
> hard to refute) proof that the reason that no one could break 
> them were the memory safety features; and then, *finally*, you 
> can point to all the people *still not using memory safe 
> languages* and say "Told you so".

Such proof is impossible because correct programs can be written 
in unsafe languages.