Deterministic Memory Management With Standard Library Progress

[Moritz Maxeiner via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 5 March 2017 at 04:36:27 UTC, Anthony wrote:
> [...]
>
> Not having it guaranteed is understandable, albeit slightly 
> disappointing.

That is the downside of community-driven development, I'm afraid.

>
> I would pick both, if I had the time to do so. I'm a college 
> student; with that in mind, I can only really learn one right 
> now without giving up most of my free time. I think it'd be 
> stressful if I tried.

As a college student nearing the end of his studies I can totally 
understand that.

>
> I was referring to phobos. I feel intimidated by the idea of 
> trying to code some of the functions of phobos myself in a 
> no-gc manner. I'm sure I'd run into things way out of my 
> knowledge domain.

I get that, though usually Phobos code is fairly readable if 
you've got a firm grasp of D templates.